FrançaisEnglish

Érudit | Dépôt de documents >
CIRPÉE - Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l'emploi >
Cahiers de recherche du CIRPÉE >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

https://depot.erudit.org//id/003954dd

Title: Comparison of the Tax System Progressivity Over Time: Theory and Application with Mexican Data
Authors: Araar, Abdelkrim
Huesca, Luis
Keywords: Fiscal Policy
Progressivity
Inequality
Polarization
Issue Date: 2014-06
Series/Report no.: Cahiers du CIRPÉE;14-19
Abstract: Assessing the progressivity of a fiscal system is relevant to develop a global idea on the extent of redistribution. In this paper we assess the evolution of progressivity over time and how economic shocks and government fiscal policy affects its design. The social performance of fiscal redistributive mechanisms in Mexico has been receiving a growing interest from politicians and researchers. The aim of this paper is to assess the dynamics of progressivity of the fiscal system in Mexico and its effect on inequality and on polarization, and this during the period of 2002-2012. What distinguishes this work is the relevance of the adopted comparison approach of progressivity and where the common support of comparison is imposed. The results of this study confirm the effectiveness of the governmental redistributive mechanisms to decrease after-tax income inequality. Based on our estimates, we find a significant increase in the progressivity of the fiscal system over time, despite the high persistent levels of polarization and inequality in the country. Finally, we find that imposing the common support of comparison has a non-negligible impact on the level of progressivity.
URI: https://depot.erudit.org/id/003954dd
Appears in Collections:Cahiers de recherche du CIRPÉE

Files in This Item:

CIRPEE14-19.pdf, (Adobe PDF ; 497.63 kB)

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

About Érudit | Subscriptions | RSS | Terms of Use | Contact us |

Consortium Érudit ©  2016