FrançaisEnglish

Érudit | Dépôt de documents >
CIRPÉE - Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l'emploi >
Cahiers de recherche du CIRPÉE >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

https://depot.erudit.org//id/003006dd

Title: On the Determinants of the Implied Default Barrier
Authors: Dionne, Georges
Laajimi, Sadok
Keywords: Barrier option
default barrier
bankruptcy prediction
maximum likelihood estimation
strategic default
Issue Date: 2009-04
Series/Report no.: Cahiers du CIRPÉE;09-14
Abstract: We use the maximum likelihood (ML) estimation approach to estimate the default barriers from market values of equities for a sample of 762 public industrial Canadian firms. The ML approach allows us to estimate the asset instantaneous drift, volatility and barrier level simultaneously, when the firm's equity is priced as a Down-and-Out European call (DOC) option. We find that the estimated barrier is positive and significant in our sample. Moreover, we compare the default prediction accuracy of the DOC framework with the KMV-Merton approach. Using probit estimation, we find that the default probability from the two structural models provides similar in-sample fits, but the barrier option framework achieves better out-of-sample forecasts. Regression analysis shows that leverage is not the only determinant of the default barrier. The implied default threshold is also positively related to financing costs, and negatively to liquidity, asset volatility and firm size. We also find that liquidation costs, renegotiation frictions and equity holders' bargaining power increase the implied default barrier level.
URI: http://132.203.59.36/CIRPEE/cahierscirpee/2009/files/CIRPEE09-14.pdf
https://depot.erudit.org/id/003006dd
Appears in Collections:Cahiers de recherche du CIRPÉE

Files in This Item:

CIRPEE09-14.pdf, (Adobe PDF ; 313.95 kB)

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

About Érudit | Subscriptions | RSS | Terms of Use | Contact us |

Consortium Érudit ©  2016